Lots of luck on thin ice from Tokyo to Paris: Following the track of the preparedness and results of Emergency Medical Services and Disaster Medical Response during 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games from the Perspective of Academic Consortium (AC2020) of Japan and Medical Advisory Board of Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Summary Introduction The 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games (2020 Tokyo Olympics) was held in Japan during the pandemic of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in 2021. Preparedness In 2016, the Academic Consortium consisting of 29 major medical associations (AC2020) was launched and undertook medical risk assessment, issuing statements, and disseminating manuals/guidelines, training materials through its website. Administratively, Tokyo Organizing Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (TOC) was responsible for preparations inside the venue, while Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG) was responsible for preparations on the last mile and around the venue. In response to the AC2020 recommendation, the TOC and TMG has set up the subcommittee for reviewing emergency and disaster medical systems for the games. Finally, the 2020 Tokyo Olympics gave up accepting spectators from abroad and limited domestic spectators. The multi-organizational training was not systematically performed until just prior to the event due to the delay in deciding on the form of this big event. Results A total of 779,820 people participated during the entire period. The 316 patients were seen at hospitals including 53 COVID- 19 cases, and the patient presentation rate (PPR) was 2.4/1000. The COVID-19 cases in Japan increased as the games approached, and a major wave peak of the epidemic was observed during the games. Conclusion If MCI had occurred during the games, the current medical care system would not have been able to cope with such situation. We were walking on thin ice, but fortunately, we didn’t step out and drown in the water. Résumé Introduction Les Jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de Tokyo 2020 (Jeux Olympiques de Tokyo 2020) ont eu lieu au Japon pendant la pandémie COVID-19 en 2021. Préparation En 2016, le Consortium Académique composé de 29 grandes associations médicales (AC2020) a été lancé et a entrepris une évaluation des risques médicaux, publié des mises aux points et diffusé des manuels/directives, du matériel de formation via son site Web. Sur le plan administratif, le comité d’organisation des Jeux olympiques et paralympiques de Tokyo (TOC) était responsable des préparatifs à l’intérieur du site, tandis que le gouvernement métropolitain de Tokyo (TMG) était responsable des préparatifs sur le dernier kilomètre et autour du site. En réponse à la recommandation AC2020, le COT et le TMG ont mis en place le sous-comité chargé d’examiner les dispositifs prévisionnels de secours pour les urgences et en cas de catastrophe pour les jeux. Enfin, les Jeux Olympiques de Tokyo 2020 ont renoncé à recevoir des spectateurs étrangers et ont limité les spectateurs nationaux. La formation multi-organisationnelle n’a été systématiquement effectuée que juste avant l’événement en raison du retard dans la décision sur la forme de ce grand événement. Résultats Au total, 779820 personnes ont participé pendant toute la période. Les 316 patients ont été vus dans les hôpitaux dont 53 cas de COVID-19, et le taux de présentation des patients (PPR) était de 2,4/1000. Les cas de COVID-19 au Japon ont augmenté à l’approche des jeux, et un pic de vague majeur de l’épidémie a été observé pendant les jeux. Conclusion Si un afflux de victimes s’était produit pendant les jeux, le système de soins médicaux actuel n’aurait pas été en mesure de faire face à une telle situation. Nous marchions sur de la glace mince, mais heureusement, nous n’avons pas dérapé et ne nous sommes pas noyés dans l’eau.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social restrictions on ambulance calls for suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm: a population-based study in Osaka prefecture, Japan.

Aim: Self-harm is a common ambulance call and is potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm increased in 2020. Methods: We undertook a population-based observational study using a database from the Osaka prefectural government. Ambulance transport of patients due to self-harm from 2016 through 2020 was investigated. We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios using a Poisson regression model to compare the annual incidence rates of ambulance transport in 2017-2020 with those in 2016. We also provided age-stratified analysis. Results: We analyzed 13,648 patients. There was no difference in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 compared with 2016. In the age group of 20-29 years, despite no difference in 2017-2019 compared with 2016, we found a 13.8% increase in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm in 2020 (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.138; 95% confidence interval, 1.025-1.265). Conclusions: Although there was no difference in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm in 2017-2019, that in 2020 increased in the age group of 20-29 years.

Impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic and subsequent social restrictions on ambulance calls for suicidal and nonsuicidal self‐harm: a population‐based study in Osaka prefecture, Japan

Aim Self‐harm is a common ambulance call and is potentially affected by the COVID‐19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the incidence of ambulance transport due to self‐harm increased in 2020. Methods We undertook a population‐based observational study using a database from the Osaka prefectural government. Ambulance transport of patients due to self‐harm from 2016 through 2020 was investigated. We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios using a Poisson regression model to compare the annual incidence rates of ambulance transport in 2017–2020 with those in 2016. We also provided age‐stratified analysis. Results We analyzed 13,648 patients. There was no difference in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self‐harm in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 compared with 2016. In the age group of 20–29 years, despite no difference in 2017–2019 compared with 2016, we found a 13.8% increase in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self‐harm in 2020 (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.138;95% confidence interval, 1.025–1.265). Conclusions Although there was no difference in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self‐harm in 2017–2019, that in 2020 increased in the age group of 20–29 years. We report the results from 13,648 patients transported by ambulance due to self‐harm from 2016 through 2020 using a population‐based database from the Osaka prefectural government. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of ambulance transport and in‐hospital mortality due to self‐harm. In the age‐stratified analysis, however, we found a statistically significant increase in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self‐harm in 2020 (adjusted IRR, 1.138;95% CI, 1.025‐1.265;P=0.016) in the age group of 20‐29 years.

Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in Japan: a retrospective study.

Objective: To elucidate the clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of COVID-19 patients who received ECMO. Among patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between January 29 and November 9, 2020, we targeted patients who received ECMO. The outcome was all-cause mortality. The baseline characteristics of the COVID-19 patients who received ECMO were summarized according to the outcome. A univariable logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the association of each factor (sex, age group, city of residence, presence of comorbidities, presence of close contact, use of dialysis, and wave) with all-cause mortality. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Among the 14,864 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during the study period, 39 patients received ECMO. Fourteen patients (35.9%) died. All patients aged 30-39 years survived, whereas all patients aged ≥80 years died. Higher mortality was observed among patients in the higher age group, and the P value for trend was significant (P value for trend: 0.04). Conclusions: Of the 14,864 COVID-19 patients in Osaka Prefecture until November 2020, 39 underwent ECMO. Of these, 14 died.

Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 in Reproductive-Aged Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women in Osaka, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of reproductive-aged female patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of female patients aged 10-49 years, diagnosed with COVID-19 in Osaka, Japan, between January and November 2020. We assessed their epidemiological and clinical characteristics according to their pregnancy status. RESULTS: A total of 4,156 patients were enrolled, of whom 29 (0.7%) were pregnant. Most patients exhibited mild symptoms, and 10.8% of the cases were asymptomatic. No moderate or severe cases were observed in pregnant women, whereas only 0.1% of the nonpregnant women had severe disease at diagnosis. No clusters were observed in the pregnant patients; however, most acquired the infection from a family member. Of the 29 pregnant women, 22 (75.9%) were hospitalized; whereas among the nonpregnant women, 579 (14.0%) were hospitalized (p < 0.001). No patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and there were no deaths among women aged 10-49 years. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women accounted for 0.7% of the total cases of COVID-19 among women aged 10-49 years. Pregnant women were more likely to be hospitalized but generally had mild disease.

Incidence and Mortality of Emergency Patients Transported by Emergency Medical Service Personnel during the Novel Corona Virus Pandemic in Osaka Prefecture, Japan: A Population-Based Study.

Although the COVID-19 pandemic affects the emergency medical service (EMS) system, little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prognosis of emergency patients. This study aimed to reveal the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the EMS system and patient outcomes. We included patients transported by ambulance who were registered in a population-based registry of patients transported by ambulance. The endpoints of this study were the incident number of patients transported by ambulance each month and the number of deaths among these patients admitted to hospital each month. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a Poisson regression model with the year 2019 as the reference were calculated. A total of 500,194 patients were transported in 2019, whereas 443,321 patients were transported in 2020, indicating a significant decrease in the number of emergency patients transported by ambulance (IRR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.88-0.89). The number of deaths of emergency patients admitted to hospital was 11,931 in 2019 and remained unchanged at 11,963 in 2020 (IRR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98-1.03). The incidence of emergency patients transported by ambulance decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, but the mortality of emergency patients admitted to hospital did not change in this study.

Reduction of influenza in Osaka, Japan during the COVID-19 outbreak: a population-based ORION registry study.

Objectives: The spread of COVID-19 has affected the incidence of other infectious diseases, but there are no reports of studies using comprehensive regional population-based data to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on influenza incidence. We attempted to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on influenza using the population-based ORION (Osaka Emergency Information Research Intelligent Operation Network) registry. Methods: The ORION registry of emergency patients treated by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel was developed by the Osaka Prefecture government. From ORION, we included emergency patients with influenza using the ICD (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) 10 codes. Influenza incidence rate ratio (IRR) and associated 95% CI were calculated. Results: The number of influenza patients transported by EMS decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The IRR showed a substantial decrease in influenza patients in 2020 (IRR 2020/2018 0.39, 95% CI 0.37-0.41). Conclusions: A comprehensive regional analysis using the population-based ORION registry confirmed that from January 2020, when the first confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection were reported in Osaka, Japan, the number of influenza patients transported by EMS decreased dramatically.

Characteristics and outcomes of older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Japan.

AIM: The epidemiological characteristics, in-hospital treatments and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 among older patients have not been fully evaluated in Japan. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study carried out in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, we enrolled patients aged ≥60 years with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 from January to November 2020. The main outcome was mortality during the observation period, based on the Infectious Diseases Control Law. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between epidemiological factors and mortality among older patients with coronavirus disease 2019. RESULTS: Older patients accounted for 21.5% (3192/14 846) of the registered patients with coronavirus disease 2019. The number of patients according to age was as follows: 60-69 years, 1140 (35.7%); 70-79 years, 1058 (33.1%); 80-89 years, 749 (23.5%); and ≥90 years, 245 (7.7%). The proportion of deaths during the observation period was 8.5% (271/3192). The proportion of deaths increased with increasing age category (from 1.9% to 20.4%, P for trend <0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients aged 70-79, 80-89 and ≥90 years had higher hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of death (2.62 [1.63-4.23], 5.99 [3.77-9.50] and 10.24 [6.03-17.40], respectively) than those aged 60-69 years. Factors such as male sex, presence of comorbidities, cluster cases in medical institutions and moderate/severe symptoms at diagnosis were also associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the epidemiological characteristics of older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. The proportion of deaths was 8.5% in total and increased with increasing age. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 629-635.

Characteristics and Survival of Intensive Care Unit Patients with Coronavirus Disease in Osaka, Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study.

The epidemiological and clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have not been adequately evaluated in Japan. We analyzed the registry data of 205 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU between February and November 2020, in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between epidemiological factors and mortality among ICU patients. Of the 205 ICU patients, 161 (78.5%) were men and 149 (72.7%) were older than 60 years. A total of 117 patients (57.1%) had comorbidities. The most common symptoms at diagnosis were mild (n = 131, 63.9%). A total of 187 patients (91.2%) received mechanical ventilation, and 32 patients (15.6%) required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients were followed up for a median of 25 days after ICU admission. A total of 147 patients (71.7%) were alive at discharge, and 58 patients (28.3%) died. The hazard ratio for mortality among patients aged >80 years was 6.02 (95% confidence interval: 2.10-17.25) in the multivariable model, which was higher than that among those aged ≤59 years. These results are useful for recognizing the clinical course of this infection in ICU patients.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric COVID-19 Patients in Osaka, Japan.

The epidemiological information on characteristics, in-hospital treatments, and outcomes of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among pediatric patients has not been fully evaluated in Japan. This was a retrospective observational study conducted in the Osaka Prefecture, Japan, and we enrolled laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients aged ≤ 19 years old from January to November in 2020. Of 14,846 COVID-19 eligible patients, 1240 pediatric patients (8.4%) were registered during the study period; 329 were children aged 0-9 years (26.5%) and 911 were adolescents aged 10-19 years (73.5%). The majority of the patients exhibited mild symptoms at diagnosis (872, 70.3%), some were asymptomatic (296, 23.9%). Cluster infections occurred in child-care facilities (26, 7.9%) among children and in universities (27, 3.0%) and schools (18, 2.0%) among adolescents. The number of close-contact cases was 260 (69.0%) in children and 459 (50.4%) in adolescents. Sixty of the children (18.2%) and 90 of the adolescents (9.9%) were hospitalized. One patient received mechanical ventilation, and none underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. One patient was admitted to the intensive care unit; there were no deaths. These results are useful for recognizing the clinical course from transmission route to outcomes of this infection in pediatric patients.

Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on bystander interventions, emergency medical service activities, and patient outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Osaka City, Japan.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic may have negatively affected bystander interventions, emergency medical service (EMS) personnel activities, and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study assessed bystander interventions, EMS activities, and patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic era and compared them with those during the non-COVID-19 pandemic era in Osaka City, Japan, where public-access automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are well established. METHODS: We conducted this population-based cohort study that included all cases with non-traumatic OHCA treated by EMS personnel and excluded cases with no resuscitation attempt, traumatic cases, cases occurring in healthcare facilities, or cases witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were compared between the COVID-19 pandemic period (February 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020) and the non-COVID-19 pandemic period (February 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019). RESULTS: During the study periods, 1687 patients were eligible for analyses (COVID-19: n = 825; non-COVID-19: n = 862). Patients with OHCA during the COVID-19 pandemic period were significantly less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (COVID-19: 33.0%; non-COVID-19: 41.3%; p < 0.001) and public-access AED pad application (COVID-19: 2.9%; non-COVID-19: 6.1%; p = 0.002) compared with patients during the non-COVID-19 pandemic period. There were no significant differences in 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes between the two periods (COVID-19: 4.6%; non-COVID-19: 6.1%; p = 0.196). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic period did not affect patient outcomes after OHCA but changed bystander behaviors in Osaka City, Japan.

Characteristics of patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the first surge versus the second surge of infections in Osaka Prefecture, Japan.

In Japan, the differences in characteristics, severity, and mortality of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients between the first and second surges of infections have not been fully understood. This study is a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients confirmed between February 1 and August 31, 2020 in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Publicly available information on patients was collected from the website of Osaka Prefecture. Patients were divided into two groups according to the date of the positive laboratory test result: the first surge (February 1 to May 22) and the second surge (May 23 to August 31). Patients' characteristics were compared between the two groups. A multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model was applied to compare severity and mortality between the two groups, where sex, age group at the onset date, city of residence, and days to test positive were adjusted. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 8,541 patients included 1,780 and 6,761 patients in the first and second surges, respectively. Age at the onset date was younger in the second surge (p < 0.001), and median of days from the onset date to the positive test date shortened from 7 to 6 days (p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that both severity and mortality were lower in the second surge than in the first surge (severity: HR: 0.51 [0.39-0.67]; mortality: HR: 0.37 [0.25-0.56]). In conclusion, severity and mortality were lower in the second surge than in the first surge among COVID-19 patients in Osaka Prefecture, Japan.

Profile of Patients with Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Osaka Prefecture, Japan: A Population-Based Descriptive Study.

Little is known about the epidemiological characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan. This is a retrospective observational study of COVID-19 patients; study was conducted from February 1 to May 31, 2020. We used publicly collected data on cases of COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. We described the patient characteristics. The Cox proportional-hazards model was applied to evaluate the association between factors (sex, onset month, age group, city of residence) and mortality, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. During the study period, 5.7% (1782/31,152) of individuals who underwent PCR testing for COVID-19 showed positive results. Among 244 patients with information on symptoms, the most common symptom was fever (76.6%), followed by cough (44.3%). Of the 1782 patients, 86 patients died. Compared with those aged 0-59 years, higher mortality was observed among those aged 60-69 years (HR: 12.02 [3.37-42.93]), 70-79 years (HR: 44.62 [15.16-131.30]), 80-89 years (HR: 68.38 [22.93-203.89]), and ≥90 years (HR: 144.71 [42.55-492.15]). In conclusion, in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, the most common symptom was fever, and older adults had higher mortality among COVID-19 patients.

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on an emergency medical service system: a population-based, descriptive study in Osaka, Japan.

AIM: Novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) was confirmed in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and the COVID-19 pandemic has spread around the world. However, no clinical studies on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency medical service (EMS) systems have been carried out. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with a study period from 1 January 2020 to 14 April 2020. We included the patients transported by ambulance for acute diseases and traffic accidents in Osaka city, Japan. The main outcome of this study was the difficulty in hospital acceptance. We calculated the rate of difficulty of hospital acceptance for each month for acute diseases and traffic accidents. RESULTS: Between 1 January and 14 April 2020, 36,981 patients were transported to hospitals by ambulance for acute diseases and 3,096 patients for traffic accidents. There was no difference in the proportion of the difficulty in hospital acceptance due to traffic accidents between 2019 and 2020, but there was an increase in the proportion of the difficulty in hospital acceptance due to acute disease after the 13th week (25-31 March) of 2020 compared to that of 2019. The odds ratio in April was 2.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.84-2.58) for acute disease. CONCLUSION: We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the EMS system in Osaka City, Japan and found that, since April 2020, the EMS system in Osaka City has been facing difficulty in terms of hospital acceptance of patients transported to hospital for acute diseases.